Updates & Insights

< Back to the Blog

Short Term Memories & The Three Factors Of Fear

by | Sep 8, 2010 | Articles

Suddenly, in the past few weeks, the markets have looked a lot scarier to a lot of nonprofessional investors.  Why?  The answer probably has something to do with human psychology. In April and May we shared our expectations for market volatility during the summer months; there would be a lot of fast movements upward, as wellas downward; but overall the market should remain pretty much where it was in the spring.  At the time we offered our monthly CK community conversations, the DOW averaged about 10,480 and now it hovers around 10,340; a little better than a one percent difference. Yet the worry factor, as measured by public opinion and consumer sentiment, is much greater now than it was just before the summer.

An Australian company called FinaMetrica has been giving lay consumers a scientifically-designed risk profile questionnaire for the past 12 years, helping financial advisors evaluate whether their clients are natural risk-takers or the kind of people who feel more comfortable if their money is stuffed safely in their mattress.  A closer look at the responses, including 2,586 individuals who took the test before and after the recent bear market, shows something surprising. People were no more risk-averse after they had been clawed by the worst bear market since the Great Depression than they had been before.  The results seem to indicate that underlying risk aversion does not change with events.  So it must be our perceptions of the risk have changed.

However as we all know by reading the paper, browsing the internet or watching TV, people including you and us are  less excited about taking market risk now than we were in, say, the early months of 2007, so these results seem impossible.  But the FinaMetrica people offer a plausible explanation for their results.  They indicate that there are three components to your willingness to expose yourself to the ups and downs of the market.  Two of them changed after the market downturn, and one of those two has recently changed again.  Understanding these risks is important so that we make conscious decisions rather than step into reactive behavior.

The first component is what might be broadly called your bravery; your willingness to take chances.  This is the part that FinaMetrica measures directly. The results show that if you were willing to skydive or take ski jumping lessons off the 90-foot hill before the Fall of 2008, you’re just as excited by the idea of putting your life at risk now.  The markets don’t change who you are fundamentally.

The second component is your risk capacity; that is, how much financial risk you can afford to take.  This factor is extremely important and is based upon ever-changing factors such as financial resources, earning capacity, saving capacity, rates of return on investments and the ability to recoup losses.  The 2008-2009 bear market has caused many of us to rethink whether we can continue to live off our assets, how early we might be able to retire and whether we can afford our current lifestyle; but a reprise of the market correction might make us wonder if we can retire at all and whether we might need to re-enter the workforce.  The intelligent approach to such concerns is to batten down the hatches.  So we become more conservative in all areas of our lives; we reduce spending, postpone retirement, and reduce expectations from our investments (i.e. we invest more conservatively.)

Component number three is our risk perception.  If we’re watching the markets go up and up and up, then we see little risk and lots of upside.  This is why, during the late 1990s tech boom, even the most timid individuals were throwing money into the market like drunken sailors.  When the markets deliver the opposite experience, such as what we have experienced today, we look at the same stocks and see nothing but risk.

This last piece of the risk tolerance puzzle is, today, sending out alarm bells that may be echoing deep in your own psyche.  The markets have just delivered the worst performance in the month of August since 2001 – which professional investors know is a random event.  But now we’re in September, that very same month when Lehman Brothers collapsed and AIG effectively declared bankruptcy back in 2008.  It also happens to be the same month that the country experienced the shock of 9/11 which, among other things, sent the global investment markets reeling.  Chances are you don’t remember it personally, but September is also the month when the 1929 crash occurred.

So we had a dismal August that gave back the market gains created in the first seven months of the year and we’re entering that scary month that we associate with recent financial disaster.  Chances are your logical mind knows that a reprise of 2008 is unlikely, and if you’ve been reading the papers, you know that corporate profits have been going through the roof in the American economy.  But the emotional part of your mind looks at the market and conjures up every negative statistic, and sees far more potential risk than reward.  You experience fear even as you strap on your parachute at 15,000 feet and give an enthusiastic high-five to the instructor who is looking a little nervous.

We don’t know whether the month of September will bring the markets back into positive territory or not, despite a lot of long-term analysis.  But if you invest based on what the markets did recently, where does that lead you?  August was negative, so get out in September.  September is positive, so get back in.  October is down; get back out; November is up, so you get back in. Over time, whether you follow this reactive formula for months or years, or through bear and bull markets, you end up in the market when you would have preferred to be out, and out when it was better to be in.

As professionals, we endeavor to take a much broader and longer perspective and not let greed, fear or the desire to catch up to some moment when the portfolio was valued higher dictate portfolio composition.  Portfolio composition should be based upon fundamentals which, more often than not, do not change, hourly, daily, weekly or even monthly.  In the long run, our approach assists you in seeing the broader view as well. It gives you an edge on others who are reacting without understanding what, exactly, is driving them to the sidelines whenever stocks go on sale.  You place your trust in us to guide you through the difficult times, not just the easy ones, and today is one of those more difficult moments.  Maintaining a broader perspective will assist you in not only reaching your goals but finding more satisfaction in your life.

Subscribe to Receive Weekly Market Updates

Speak with an Integral Wealth Advisor

No matter your life stage, our advisors are here to help you navigate your unique financial landscape. Schedule a call. We look forward to meeting you.

Disclaimer

 You are now leaving the official Colman Knight website and entering a third-party website. Colman Knight is not responsible for the content of third-party sites, nor does Colman Knight guarantee or endorse the information, recommendations, products or services offered on third-party sites. The information available through this link should not be considered either a recommendation or a solicitation of any offer to purchase or sell any security.

Also, please be aware that third-party sites may have different privacy and security policies than Colman Knight. We encourage you to review the privacy and security policies of any third-party website before you provide personal or confidential information.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact your Colman Knight advisor

Share This